The role I will play within the new Broxtowe Borough Council

Below is the text of a press release I have issued today.
The New Council at Broxtowe – Full Council meeting tonight Wednesday 15 May 2019
At the full council meeting at Broxtowe Borough Council tonight a new administration will be formed following the elections on 2 May 2019.
As a result of these elections – none of the major political parties has overall control of the council.
I have taken a number of telephone calls from both the Conservative and Labour leaders, during the past week – asking for my support as an Independent to help form an administration forming a coalition with their respective parties.
I am a member of no political party having quit the Labour Party in February this year:

After very careful consideration and reflection having considered both offers first from the Conservative Party and second a coalition of Labour, Liberal and two other Independent cllrs I have decided to accept an offer support the coalition.

The council will be asked tonight to recognise tonight the leadership arrangements for the council going forward.  I will be supporting a motion for Cllr Milan Radulovic (Lab) to be recognised as Leader with Cllr Steve Carr (Lib) as Deputy Leader.
The best offer made to me was by Cllr Radulovic in terms of getting the best deal for my residents in Kimberley comprises the following elements:
I will separately hold the post of Vice Chair of the Council’s new Personnel Committee.
I am looking forward to some very exciting work ahead.
Richard Robinson
Independent Cllr Broxtowe Borough Council
Richard S Robinson
Borough Councillor Kimberley – Broxtowe Borough Council
4 Peacock Drive
NG16 3HW
Tel: 0775 1970 640
T: @drummerrich1

1981 – 2019 – why 38 years in the Labour Party for me has today come to an end

I write this today Wednesday 27 February 2019 personally from a good place.  A strong place.  My marriage to Sarah is strong, our children are flourishing.  We have a strong network of close friends whom we have sought wisdom, prayer and advice from as this undoubtedly life changing decision has been made.

It’s life changing as whilst I have been married to Sarah for 33 years, my marriage to the Labour Party has surpassed this by some five years.   It’s simply therefore not possible to leave something that has been an integral part of your every day existence and DNA for nearly four decades without heart aching sadness.  Yet there is no bitterness or regret.   Just the innate sense that politics in this country deeply yearns and demands something new, an approach that leaves the old tribal culture dominating so much of the current traditional party political culture behind, and embraces the values of integrity, openness and critically being able to disagree well.  I want to play my part in enabling a new politics proliferate.

My Labour history

I first joined the Labour Party in 1981 aged nineteen – no doubt against the wishes of my parents.  I worked for the then Department of Health & Social Security and started to witness first hand the misery of long-term unemployment – and recall grown men crying in front of me having being put out of work because of the repressive Thatcher regime.

I was also horrified how the Miners were treated by Thatcher and MacGregor; this served as another reason for joining the Labour Party.

  • In terms of elected office at borough and county council level, I have fought and won elections as a Labour candidate in Broxtowe, Nottingham in 1991, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003 and 2007, 2011 and 2015.  In 2003, 2007 and 2011 I topped the poll in my 3-member borough council ward.
  • I was Labour Parliamentary candidate in Charnwood in 2005.  I put my heart and soul into this.  We came second in a rock solid Tory seat.  I’m told that this was fourth lowest swing against Labour (0.68%) throughout the whole of the East Midlands.  House of Commons statisticians equated this to an additional 2,500 votes taken off the Tories which went to Labour.
  • Since 2005 I applied to be the Labour Parliamentary Candidate in Shrewsbury (2006) – got to the hustings and came 2nd, South Derbyshire (2008) also got through to the hustings and came 2nd as I did in 2014 for Hemel Hempstead.
  • I applied twice to be Labour Parliamentary candidate in Amber Valley – the area where I was born, but was thwarted on both occasions.
  • I worked on Ed Miliband’s Labour Leadership campaign in 2015 as Regional Organiser in the East Midlands.
  • I have attended every Labour Party Conference between 2002 and 2018 and spoke on the Conference main stage in 2007 –
  • I was the Vice Chair of Ashfield Constituency Labour Party (CLP) until today and also Chair of Eastwood & Brinsley Labour Party.
  • I have served on internal Labour selection, disciplinary and appeals panels.
  • Apart from Gavin I have worked for Labour MPs – Helen Clark, Natascha Engel and Andy Reed.

So why Leave?  – A matter of integrity

I have battled through many recent days with my conscience (and encountered a number of sleepless nights).  I have decided that it would be disingenuous of me to continue campaigning and stand for re-election as a Labour councillor knowing that I can no longer publicly endorse the national Party leadership.   I am not a supporter of the “hard left” in the Labour movement which has near total control in the Party, but fully accept that the leader has unprecedented legitimacy having been voted in twice overwhelmingly by the current Labour membership.

I work for Gavin Shuker MP in Luton South, and have done since 2012.  He was one of the seven Labour MPs that left Labour last week to form the new Independent Group in the House of Commons.  The decision that I have taken to leave the Labour Party though is entirely mine after much personal reflection.

It would undoubtedly have been easier for me to play this low key and continue as a Labour councillor.  Probably not that many people in Nottingham know I work for Gavin.   Opponents could have well pointed however out that here was a Labour councillor working for an MP who has left the Labour Party.  A conflict of interests here surely?

Or I could look for another job – that was another possibility.

However my heart and head says Gavin has done the right thing.  I support him.  In the bigger picture and beyond Broxtowe – our current politics is broken and tired; a different culture is required.  Does this mean that I mean I wholeheartedly and immediate endorse and agree with every stance that will be taken by the Independent Group?  No.  There are some huge challenges!

I do want to play my part though nationally in helping shape this new culture.  I was listening to a Craig Groeschel podcast at the weekend where he interviews Chip Heath an American academic & Professor of Organisational Behaviour at the Stanford Graduate school of Business.  He talks about how Leaders have at times and particular moments to be more unreasonable and of the need to break the script.

We live in an ever changing, fast moving and increasingly complex society.  The Brexit debate of course epitomises this complexity perfectly, and dominates the whole political discourse. 

Whilst I personally voted for and enthusiastically support Remain, I acknowledge though that there are completely understandable reasons why so many constituents I have talked with in Kimberley voted to Leave and have not changed their minds.  I don’t think they are racist.  Neither do I get the sense that the majority of people want a 2nd Referendum.  Some do I accept, but I do not share that view.

Furthermore what appears evident to me is that many who voted Leave wanted to shake up the broken settlement of our national politics.

However all of the current MPs in the new Independent Group support a 2nd Referendum, whilst still wanting to shake our system. Here then perfectly demonstrates the complexity! 

A further significant challenge for me personally is the fact that there are now former Conservative MPs who voted through austerity measures hitting the most vulnerable in our society, sitting side by side former Labour MPs.   I admit that this does not at all naturally sit easily with me.  However I want to start to put behind me the narrow party interests and pursue policies that are evidence-based, not led by ideology, taking a long-term perspective to the challenges of the 21st century in the national interest.  Where we have to disagree, we’ll disagree well.  

Which brings me onto another point that has increasingly frustrated me over the past few years.  Our traditional party political culture of politics in this country and believe you me this is just as evident in Broxtowe as it is in Westminster, dictates that it’s essentially impossible at times to work together openly with members of different political parties.  Of course politics is a tribal sport.  However – very often good local grassroots campaigns are hijacked needlessly by the more confrontational cllrs from an opposing party for no other reason than blind party loyalty (and often jealousy because of the publicity a good local campaign has had).

For example in Broxtowe there are a few very good Conservative councillors including Lydia Ball, John Handley & Margaret Handley, and we work well together on various projects with them that will benefit the whole community.  We clearly don’t always agree on everything but have a mature working relationship, and respect our differences.   Where we disagree, we agree to disagree well.  I know that Margaret and John have been subjected however to the most ridiculous insults and criticism from some quarters – particularly on how we are working together in looking at the tram extension from Phoenix Park to the new Super Hub Transport Link in Langley Mill – just because of my involvement as as a Labour councillor.  Is this really a mature way to do politics in the best interests of the community?

In conclusion

I am not leaving the Labour Party because I have fallen out with any one individual.  I haven’t, and life is way too short for that anyway.

I have resigned from the Party today, will sit out the rest of my term as an Independent councillor until May 2nd this year, and stand as an Independent in Kimberley for the Broxtowe elections.  I have served constituents in Kimberley with fierce loyalty and passion since I first became elected there in 1997 and hope to continue this after May.  I cherish them (well most of them) dearly.  Everyone hasn’t and won’t always agree with me, that won’t stop me working however for the whole community, and engaging constructively with councillors from all political parties.

Some may argue that this is a reckless gamble on my behalf as opposed to a calculated risk.  I believe it’s the latter, I appreciate I will come in for some criticism but what I have done is to try and take a brave, open and principled stand.

I have Labour friends that span the decades, I have both grown up with, and campaigned with for Labour throughout many areas of the country – from Norwich to Dagenham, Amber Valley to Northampton, Broxtowe to Chesterfield, Charnwood to Ashfield – from Derby, Loughborough, Stoke on Trent to Leicester and Luton.

Many Labour Party members have been friends for what seems like time immemorial; Andy Cooper & Colin Sansom (Nuthall & Giltbrook respectively), Ted Perfect in Stapleford, John Legrys in North West Leicestershire, Max Hunt and Betty Newton in Loughborough, Paul Gill, Tom & Marilyn Cowles in Charnwood, Gloria De Piero MP and James Robinson in Ashfield, Alex Sobel MP for Leeds North West, Francis Steer and Olly Martins in Luton, David Mellen in Nottingham City, Andy Furlong (Labour Regional Board East Mids), Kathy Salt in Bolsover, Chris Ostrowski Labour PPC for Watford, Celia Cox, Pete & Meg Baxendale, Chris Emmas-Williams and Paul Jones (Amber Valley), Rachael Maskell MP in York Central, Paddy Tipping the Police & Crime Commissioner for Nottinghamshire, Nick Palmer the Labour MP for Broxtowe between 1997 and 2010, Louise Davies from Sheffield (and Director of Christians on the Left).

To my dear Blue Labour friends including John Milbank, Adrian Pabst, Maurice Glasman, Ed Rennie, Ian Geary, Rowenna Davis, et al – they have for a long time been a source of inspiration and encouragement.

I will remain a proud member of my Trade Union GMB.  In the GMB Midlands and East Coast Region – Richard Oliver the Regional Organiser is an outstanding colleague and friend. Trade Unions are a non negotiable part of a fairer more equal society.

I’ve always enjoyed a strong relationship with Labour Party Regional Office staff in the East Midlands, in particular I will miss George Carr-Williamson enormously.

I should also pay tribute to the leader of the Labour Group in Broxtowe Cllr Milan Radulovic – we’ve remained friends through thick and thin since 1991 – when we first stood together.  I hope our friendship can continue.

Finally there are a couple of people in Eastwood & Brinsley Labour Party that are absolutely salt of the earth and never get any headlines – Matt and Bob Bullock.  I will miss them also dearly.

In terms of the particular policy areas I am interested in and will pursue as an Independent councillor, this will include:

  1. Increasing power from Westminster to the most appropriate level, trusting and involving local communities
  2. Giving every child the best start in life through investment in early years provision
  3. Electoral Reform
  4. Fairer & genuinely re-distributive Taxation (looking at the idea of a Land Value Tax)
  5. Public transport investment
  6. Preventative measures to reduce health inequalities
  7. Promoting renewable energy

In addition to drawing on my faith, inspiration and clarity from the Bible I have been actively reading and undertaking research to sharpen my thinking and rationale for the decision I have now made.  I have also sought the counsel of close friends and colleagues and spent many hours meditating on the pros and cons of this decision. This course of action has not been taken without significant reflection on my part.  At the end of the day I have to be true to myself and the people I have been elected to serve.  The following books have proved really helpful to this extent:

  • The Leadership Lab – Understanding Leadership in the 21st century – (Chris Lewis & Pippa Malgren)
  • Why we get the Wrong Politicians (Isabel Hardman)
  • Lincoln on Leadership (Donald T Phillips)
  • 12 Rules for Life (Jordan Peterson)

I’d also recommend any podcast from Craig Groeschel (there’s one in particular talking about six aspects of a better leadership) – a) have the discipline to start b) the courage to stop c) a person to empower, d) a system to create e) a relationship to initiate f) a risk to take.

It’s the people who matter most, that must come before Party loyalty, and as one constituent in Kimberley said to me on Monday when I was visiting a broken fence with her (yes that’s the glamorous job of a councillor) – “it’s really rather quite an exciting time in politics isn’t it”.  She wasn’t referring to the fence.

Lenin once quipped there are decades in politics when nothing happens and then there are weeks when decades happens.

I’m 56 and I hope during the next decade we can start on the course of reconciling a divided and fractured nation with a new robust and relational politics in Britain embracing the Common Good.

I would want my 38 years in the Labour Party to be viewed and remembered as a celebration – but it’s time to move on.  Despite the inner turmoil – I’m in a good place.


Rumbletums – Victoria Street, Kimberley – Fundraiser

Saturday 16 February 2019

Live music plus refreshments


See document here: 3188177 for full details

What can Trump’s victory teach Labour about winning elections?

This article by James Morris appeared in the Fabian Review – Up Our Street – Winter 2016

The article itself is not actually on-line yet, so I’ve scanned the details in and you can read the article in full here: epson011 epson012

James urges the Left to look at the gig picture and argues astutely that however effective our “ground field campaign” is, it’s of little use if the message and messenger is found wanting.

You can find James on Twitter at @JamesDMorris

Submission to Nottinghamshire Council regarding suggested highways improvements in Kimberley – Swingate and Maws Lane areas

Wednesday 24 August 2016

This letter – at the Word document (and also shown below) – represents a culmination of extensive consultation with residents over a significant period of time (and their subsequent feedback).  It asks Nottinghamshire County Council to take a serious long term look at the traffic problems in Kimberley and urges a detailed plan to be drawn up looking at various proposals for improvement.

A Word document can be found in full by clicking on:

Nottinghamshire County Council v002


The text of the letter is also shown below:

Nottinghamshire County Council

FAO – Mrs Steph Walford

Senior Improvements Officer

Via East Midlands Ltd

Major Projects & Improvements

County Hall

West Bridgford


NG2 7QP                                                                                                                                 24 August 2016



Dear Steph


Request for consideration of suggested improvements for traffic flow and pedestrian safety

Swingate, Kimberley & Maws Lane area Kimberley

(Swingate & Hardy Street Action Plans)


I have pleasure in submitting papers for your detailed consideration with relation to community consultation exercises that have been undertaken in Kimberley during 2016.


I hope that we can work together with partners to produce some imaginative and long term benefits for local people and therefore address long standing traffic problems in this part of Broxtowe.


Many thanks for your time and assistance in this matter, and would be happy to meet up to discuss in more this in more detail.


Please do not hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions.


I look forward to receiving your response.


Best regards





Richard S Robinson

Labour Councillor – Kimberley

Broxtowe Borough Councillor

4 Peacock Drive



NG16 3HW

0775 1970 640









In my January 2016 newsletter I produced a report as follows:


This report emanated as a result of discussions with residents of two separate areas of Kimberley – Hardy Street/Maws Lane and Swingate, during 2015.


I subsequently held two consultation meetings on Wednesday 27 January 2016 and

Saturday 30 January 2016 to discuss with members of the public the suggestions contained in the above report.


As a result of the public consultations – a number of detailed suggestions for improvement came forward from local residents – these are contained within my March newsletter:


Extracts from this are shown below:


With regards to Hardy Street area a number of residents requested that consideration be given to making Maws Lane and Hardy Street a one-way system.  Particular issues were raised about traffic congestion in and around Hardy Street and also poor visibility at the Eastwood Road/Maws Lane Junction.


Additionally, I was presented with a petition regarding the possible loss of two car parking spaces on Eastwood Road Kimberley, close to the Maws Lane junction.  The feedback from local residents was that taking two car spaces away would only be a short-term solution and would not resolve the wider issue that needs to be addressed; that of the traffic congestion in and around the Maws Lane junction, and that a more comprehensive solution was required.


  • Make Maws Lane and Hardy Street a one -way system: traffic would flow up Maws Lane and down Hardy Street.  It is envisaged that having this arrangement in place would reduce the congestion at the Maws Lane junction, and make traffic flow better overall. This would also have the added benefit of potentially keeping the two parking spaces that were at risk.I have also designed a special survey about the suggested one-way system, which you can access here:    


  • Traffic needs to be able to exit Greens Lane more quickly; this would relieve congestion – this could be achieved by having traffic lights at the bottom of Greens Lane to replace the mini roundabout.



  • Make a wider exit at the bottom of Greens Lane having a left and right turning lane – this would enable traffic to exit Greens Lane more quickly – this would involve taking some of the flowerbed away on the left of Greens Lane.
  • Pedestrian crossing too close to mini roundabout at bottom of Greens Lane.
  • Bus stops on Greens Lane – opposite each other, also bus timing point on Greens Lane – contributes to congestion – could timing point be moved to Knowle Lane?
  • Construct lay-bys for buses on Greens Lane to relieve congestion – Sainsbury’s to contribute to cost.  Acknowledged this would take space from car parks in both precinct and Sainsbury’s.



High Street

  • Possible escape road for Swingate residents from Sainsbury’s car park routed through old telephone exchange on High Street, Swingate. This would avoid need for Swingate residents to turn onto Greens Lane when exiting Sainsbury’s car park.
  • Cherubs Day Nursery – problem caused by vehicles exiting onto blind corner – suggested these vehicles could exit via road through old telephone exchange (see above).



Suggestions relating to both areas

  • 20mph limit through centre of Kimberley from Broomhill Rd to Nine Corners (Hardy Street)
  • 20mph limit along Maws Lane, Cliff Boulevard and Hardy Street.

























This is a summary of points raised by local residents at the January public meeting concerning the Maws Lane area of Kimberley


Findings from survey – and individual feedback from constituents:

As a result of the public survey


the following results have been compiled as follows:


Consultation on Proposals to make Maws Lane/ Hardy Street One-Way:-

Summary of individual email responses on proposals (see Appendix 1):

Number of email respondents who agree with proposal                                       24

Number of email respondents who disagree with proposal                                   19


Summary of results from online consultation on proposals (see Appendix 1):

Number of online respondents who agree with proposal                                       38

Number of online respondents who disagree with proposal                                 41

Undecided                                                                                                                                 9


Associated issues

I presented a petition to Broxtowe Borough Council on 2nd March this year urging that Broxtowe work with the County Council to look at the longer term traffic problems in and around Eastwood Road/Maws Lane junction. I understand that this petition subsequently was presented to the County Council and was referred to the appropriate committee for consideration.


I have seen correspondence from the County Council during the past couple of weeks from Crash Investigator Phil Gow – and have a site meeting on Thursday 25 August 2016 to discuss the proposals to remove car parking spaces on the Eastwood Road/Maws Lane junction.



My recommendation is that the County Council look seriously at the long-term traffic issues affecting Kimberley, and in particular address the problems that have been highlighted in both the Swingate and Hardy Street areas. The problems identified are long-standing issues that will not go away and will only increase in intensity as increasing numbers of houses are built locally.


The feeling of many local residents for example concerning Maws Lane is that purely taking away two car parking spaces will simply act as a ‘sticking plaster’ over many more significant problems.

I have, for example, at the request of local residents, asked the County Council to relocate the bus stop in this area that causes much annoyance to both pedestrians and drivers alike.


Clearly there are divided opinions on making Maws Lane one-way. I would like to specifically request that detailed transport plan be drawn that considers the advantages and disadvantages of a one-way system on Maws Lane and also identifies the indicative costs.


I would specifically like to request that the County Council undertake a separate study of the Swingate area – to consider the problems on the corner of Greens Lane and High Street near the Cherubs Day Nursery.   There are tangible suggestions that local residents have mentioned for improvement here – for example changing the egress for drivers coming out of the Nursery.

Appendix 1


Consultation on Proposals to make Maws Lane/ Hardy Street one-way


Responses received April/May 2016

Number of respondents                                                                                                       45

Respondents’ addresses (not given by everyone):

Maws Lane                                                                                                                   7

Hardy Street                                                                                                                6

Beverley Drive                                                                                                             4

Eastwood Road                                                                                                           3

Edinboro Row                                                                                                              2

Kempton Close                                                                                                           1

Haydock Close                                                                                                             1

Truman St                                                                                                                     1

Jubilee St                                                                                                                       1

Town View                                                                                                                   1


Number of respondents who agree with proposal                                                     24

Number of respondents who disagree with proposal                                               19

Respondents who make observations but do not express an opinion                2


Maws Lane residents:

Number of respondents who agree with proposal                                                     5

Number of respondents who disagree with proposal                                               2


Hardy Street residents:

Number of respondents who agree with proposal                                                     2

Number of respondents who disagree with proposal                                               4


The parking places at the bottom of Maws Lane:

  • Specifically mentioned by 12 people,
  • 6 people think they should be removed ,
  • 3 people think they should stay,
  • 2 people think a one-way system isn’t justified to save parking places,
  • 1 person thinks parking does restrict view of right turners.


Reasons for agreeing with one-way system

  • Removes confusion over right of way on Maws Lane; some people don’t understand it,
  • Avoids aggressive road rage incidents on Maws Lane,
  • Avoids dangerous right turn at bottom of Maws Lane,
  • Removes dangerous bend on Hardy Street about halfway up by Parkham Road,
  • It would improve traffic flow,
  • Retains parking places outside shops on Eastwood Road.

Some people express agreement but do have reservations about it.


Objections raised

  • Wider road network needs to be taken into consideration e.g. Newdigate Street which is considered worse than Maws Lane; residents feel that proposals would displace traffic onto Newdigate Street,
  • Reduces options for Hardy Street residents to avoid congestion as they would be forced to use Maws Lane or Newdigate Street to access Watnall/ Hucknall area,
  • Hardy Street would become a main road with increased traffic flow and speed causing concern for school children’s safety; traffic calming measures would be needed. Apparently the brewery avoided using top part of Hardy Street as a courtesy to the school,
  • Issues surrounding parking – inconsiderate parking, school parking. Parking problems on Hardy Street would not be solved by one-way system. Haydock Close already used as school carpark and possibly this would be made worse.


Other concerns raised and opinions expressed

  • Lorries are using Maws Lane/Cliff Blvd as access from Watnall/Hucknall to IKEA island – is a weight limit in place and is it enforced?
  • Large volume of traffic using Eastwood Road instead of the by-pass,
  • Excessive speed of traffic on Eastwood Road – dangerous for pedestrians,
  • Position of bus stop and pedestrian crossing is very close to exit of Maws Lane onto Eastwood Road, this makes situation worse; feeling is these could be moved nearer Premier shop/Gilthill,
  • Mini roundabout would be needed at the bottom of Hardy Street (Nine Corners) as this is another difficult right turn,
  • Impact of the new housing on Hardy Street and Brewery site not considered,
  • Unknown effect of the Golden Guinea becoming a Co-op shop,
  • Proposals could affect Truman St and Jubilee St – could increase traffic on these roads,
  • Concern re impact on bus provision for elderly residents,
  • Concern re emergency vehicles access if one-way system introduced, would it cause delay?
  • What would happen to Brewery Street?
  • Occasional flash flooding on Eastwood Road by Church Hill has caused diversion up Hardy Street and down Maws Lane; this would not be possible if new system in place,
  • If Parkham Road is part of solution – it is un-adopted and no one knows who owns it,
  • Things are better left alone; narrow streets just have to be accepted.


Other solutions suggested relating to Maws Lane

  • Traffic lights to control traffic on Maws Lane instead of Give Way,
  • STOP sign at top of Maws Lane instead of Give Way which drivers ignore, also improve painted lines to prevent confusion over who has Right of Way,
  • Make Maws Lane exit onto Eastwood Road left turn only,
  • Mini roundabout at Maws lane exit,
  • Alternative one-way system suggested: Jubilee Street one-way up and Maws Lane one-way down; takes Hardy Street out of the equation,
  • Build new road on derelict land behind Maws Lane (which used to be builders yard) to relieve Maws Lane problem,
  • No parking outside shops at Maws Lane junction or restrict parking to 30 mins.
  • Make parking on Maws Lane residents only,
  • Maws Lane parking impossible as Council refuses to drop kerbs and allow front gardens to be used for parking.


Other suggestions and concerns

  • 20 mph speed limit needed
  • Pedestrian crossing on Cliff Blvd by Hardy Street; this is needed by school children
  • Widen Cliff Blvd and take out speed bumps and chicane
  • Cliff Blvd problems are worse; rearrange parking to be diagonal rather than horizontal to create more spaces. Take away some grass verges on Cliff Blvd to make more spaces
  • Build new road from Watnall to IKEA island
  • Poor street lighting on Maws Lane
  • Difficulty getting to IKEA as a pedestrian due to traffic/ traffic issues at IKEA island
  • Concerns about more housing



This document has also been sent to Nottinghamshire Police and Nottinghamshire Fire Authority for their comments


Consultation on making Maws Lane and Hardy Street, Kimberley One Way


Broxtowe Borough Council – their first Tory budget for over 20 years & my response

Wednesday 2 March 2016

Madam Mayor, Fellow Councillors, officers, ladies & gentleman

I want to start off my brief comments by commending the Labour Group – on producing a comprehensive and rational alternative Budget Statement.  Something we never ever received during all the many years the Conservatives spent in Opposition at Broxtowe.

In fact It’s been over 20 years since a Tory controlled Budget presented to this council.  Milan, me few others here witnessed that.  Over 20 years, I had a full head of hair, Tony Blair was leader of the Opposition, Donald Trump was anonymous, Leeds United were in the Premiership, Howard Wilkinson Manager.

Some things have changed  – fortunes of my beloved Leeds United, runners & riders American Politics  my hair radically changed, somethings however remain exactly the same.

That is this, lack of leadership, lack of leadership shown by Conservatives in Broxtowe, controlled by a vocal yet manipulative inward aggressive looking elite.

Lack of leadership

Madam Mayor – Conservatives have had over 20 years to present a vision, work out where they want to take Broxtowe- yet their message from the early 90s, is just the same as today

  • They don’t really want to build houses
  • They don’t like public transport
  • They want to close Durban House
  • Close cash offices (hit poorest areas hardest)

So translated – particularly in the north of the borough – Broxtowe is closed for business.  No vision, no plans, no asks.  No willingness to be brave or think outside the box.

And it is particularly closed for business with regards to Oxylane.   This is the starkest example of single lack of leadership. 

Myth that the leisure centre in Kimberley can continue until further notice, – is that a myth.  That Oxylane would spell it’s death knell is also a myth.  Conservative members been told that.

Yes, you can turn around and say that we had several goes to see this development through.  We ain’t perfect.  We failed, failed because every single Conservative member voted to oppose.  Some however, since very bravely and commended can see here an opportunity.  They see what’s in the interests of the people of Broxtowe, and not in the interests of the Tory party.

Oxylane you have the Opportunity to invest, enhance environment, improve health sports provision for youngsters, and families.  Boost council finances. That’s what Labour would do.

You have the opportunity to make life better, fairer residents Broxtowe, but you have failed after 1 budget.

This budget fails, fails though lack of leadership, lack of vision, lack of credibility, after over 20 years opposition people of Broxtowe deserve better.

Europe – decision day fast approaches

Nick Palmer was Labour MP for Broxtowe between 1997 and 2010.  He is sorely missed in Broxtowe.

I worked in a voluntary capacity for him for a number of years as both borough and county councillor.  I don’t recall ever having met someone who worked as hard as Nick, yet he always had time for constituents.  He was an excellent back-bench Labour MP.

One of Nick’s many attributes was being able to reach across the political divide, and especially in Broxtowe – which in large measure has a strong natural Tory tendency.   He was able to reach out to many constituents (just over 3,000 at the last count) by in part, keeping in touch via email with detailed and regular newsletters.

Even though he now has no official ties with Broxtowe he still takes the time to write occasionally on matters of interest – his latest missive, on Europe is shown below:


Europe – decision day fast approaches

Hi all, I’ve not posted for a while, and I’m afraid it’s just that I’ve been taking a break from politics – travelling for pleasure, going out to the theatre and movies, sorting out some family issues, winning some poker tournaments. I’m sorry not to have won last May, but freedom has its charms too! However, with the referendum apparently just months away, I thought it might be helpful to post some comments on that.   It’s a pity, in my view, that the debate is focused so much on whether Mr Cameron’s frankly modest renegotiation package is successful or not. It’s always been obvious to anyone in politics that Mr Cameron had a 3-point plan:


1. Offer the referendum as a way to bring UKIP leaners back and win the election

2. Get some sort of token package of reform

3. Declare victory and win the referendum


Older people remember all this – it’s exactly what Harold Wilson did in the 60s.   You may think it’s cynical, though stage 1 certainly worked – if the Conservatives hadn’t offered the referendum, they’d have leaked a few percentage points to UKIP and we’d now have a different government. A good thing or a bad thing, it’s all history.   But quite soon, Mr Cameron will also be history – he’s retiring whether he wins or not. I wish him many happy years, but it would be ridiculous to decide the future of Britain on the basis of whether we approve of a retiring politician and his manoeuvres. The fundamental issue is this – and it’s something which has struck me with increasing force in my present (animal welfare) job, which has taken me to 25 countries in the last few years.


The world is increasingly divided into regional power blocs. Nearly every continent has one now, in different stages of development, each with preferential trade internally and an attempt to form a common front to defend their interests globally. We do not have a choice of blocs – we can’t sensibly join NAFTA in North America or ASEAN in South East Asia or the African Union.


We can be in the EU, or we can be on our own. And to be on our own in today’s world is a risky and frankly unusual decision. If we think we can win global arguments on our own, we are deluded; what will usually happen is that we will bob along in the slipstream of decisions made by others. This is not to argue that the EU is a terrific example of good governance. It creaks. It’s not very transparent. It’s slow. It’s dominated by big business. But for this continent, it’s actually the only game in town. That’s illustrated by the difficulty that the Leave campaign is having in identifying the alternative. Broadly speaking, there are two variants. We can join EFTA, like Norway, or we can refuse to join anything. If we join EFTA, we will have almost exactly the same rules as now – for instance, we will still have free movement of labour from throughout the EU. In EFTA, I don’t think we’d see a big exodus of business. The difference is merely that we will have less influence in deciding what those rules are, and certainly no veto. Or we can be entirely separate. But that means being outside the EU free trade area, subject to tariffs. In that case, we really would see the big companies moving out with a big loss of jobs. Their European offices are going to be more important than the British market if we force them to choose.


I’ve heard the comparison that the EU is like an awkward marriage – there comes a point where you feel that the marriage is just too much hassle, and you’d be happier with someone else. But we need to be clear that there isn’t anyone else: the alternative is splendid isolation. To pursue the analogy, we would be choosing to be lone bachelors in a world increasingly dominated by families. I don’t think it’s a good idea. I think we realistically belong in the European area, and we should work to make the best of it instead of grumbling from the sidelines. But I’m not saying that because I’m interested in Mr Cameron’s package, or any other politician’s stance.


It simply seems to me that we are best off staying in partnership with our neighbours, whether it’s difficult or not. In the end, Europe is going to sink or swim together, and we cannot opt out of that reality – only from being part of the decisions that will decide whether it succeeds or not. Don’t vote for tactical reasons, to annoy Cameron or reward anyone else. Instead, vote for a coherent long-term future for Britain as part of the continent where we live.

Best regards Nick


To contact Nick: twitter: @nick4broxtowe

What can be done to improve traffic flow, congestion and pedestrian safety in Hardy Street/Maws Lane, Cliff Boulevard & Swingate areas of Kimberley? Initial report.

Neighbourhood consultation – Swingate & Hardy Street/Cliff Boulevard Action Plan – January 2016

Members of the public are invited to attend one of two community consultation sessions taking place at Rumbletums, Victoria Street, Kimberley to discuss how traffic congestion and pedestrian safety can be improved in two particular areas of Kimberley.
The sessions take place as follows:

– Wednesday 27 January 2016 – between 3pm and 7pm

– Saturday    30 January 2016  – between 10am and 12 noon


Members of the public can meet with myself informally over tea and coffee to discuss the report that has been compiled following a questionnaire being issued last year.  Two Kimberley residents – John Sykes of Swingate and Sue Page of Tewkesbury Drive will also be present as they have helped compile the report.

I am very keen to ensure that local residents views are taken fully into account when future decisions are made.  I feel that for far too long decisions have been imposed upon local people and I am determined to see that the best ideas that the community puts forward are adopted.
Hard copies of the report will be available at both sessions, and electronic copies can be found by clicking on the following link: baR Robinson traffic doc Jan 16 – should this link not work, the full text of the report is reprinted below.
(Note when reading the report – the parts in bold and italics – represent comments and contributions made by Mr John Sykes).






 “What can be done to improve traffic flow and congestion, and pedestrian safety in two specific areas of Kimberley: Hardy Street/Cliff Boulevard and Swingate/High Street areas?”



Feedback from neighbourhood consultation – initial report





January 2016





My name is Richard Robinson and I have been a Borough councillor in Kimberley continually from 1997 to date.  In that time many issues have been brought to my attention by local residents ranging from housing and planning issues through to anti-social behaviour, HGV vehicles weight limits and restrictions, parking, transport and regeneration matters.  Some issues remain relevant for a while for example anti-social behaviour.  Others however have a much longer life span and tend not to simply fade into the background, or even if they do they soon come back to life at relatively short notice.


The following report is in response to long standing and ongoing local traffic related concerns which have been highlighted by numerous individuals over the years, and which continue to blight our community.


At this point I would like acknowledge the work of members of the local community.  Lots of people have taken the time to get in touch and for all of the comments I am extremely grateful.    I would especially like to thank Ros Broker, Mary McGuckin and

Rev Barbara Holbrook for their support.  Additionally, and in particular two Kimberley residents Sue Page of Tewkesbury Drive and John Sykes of Swingate, have given up their time and helped to interrogate the survey data and compile the responses.


In compiling this report we have sought the support of many members of the public. Through our traffic survey we have identified what the main issues are and some thoughts on how they may be resolved.


As a community we need a forward thinking and collaborative plan to tackle these problems which have been plaguing our historic town for years.  I know we can create a very positive momentum behind this initiative that involves all stakeholders, and allows us to continue to work together to ensure Kimberley becomes a better place to live and work in, as well as a place that people will want to visit.


Following on from the publication of this initial report I have arranged a number of meetings which the public are welcome to attend.  The meetings will be held on

Wednesday 27 January 2016 at Rumbletums, Victoria Street, Kimberley between 3pm and 7pm, and on Saturday 30 January 2016 same venue between 10 am and 12 noon.


The purpose of the meetings is to discuss the initial survey findings, identify next steps/ ways in which we can work to enhance our community’s quality of life by defining and facilitating longer term effective traffic management measures.


This report advocates a different kind of approach to problem solving, a more collaborate and inclusive arrangement which is community-led and which puts the views of local people at the forefront of any changes.


Our aim in publishing this report is to provide a high degree of awareness of the problems and how they affect people, to invite local residents to join the discussions, encourage everyone who is affected to contribute to the development and implementation of a long term plan, and to provide regular updates and promote consultation events.

I hope you can take the time to read the information in this report and feel free to contribute in any way you can.


In moving this initiative forward, we will of course work closely with the statutory agencies and principal councils, as well as our own town council.


Richard Robinson

Labour Borough Councillor Kimberley





Background and Context to report


Between February and May 2015 last year in particular, some very specific problems of traffic congestion, pedestrian safety and traffic flow were specifically raised with me again by residents in two areas of Kimberley who were frustrated with the lack of any noticeable improvements to long standing problems.  Those areas are Swingate and High Street, and Hardy Street and Cliff Boulevard, Kimberley.


For people living in the Swingate area the main problems related to a hold up on Greens Lane near Sainsbury’s which can lead to periods of frustration and delay for residents trying both to enter and exit this area.  Swingate is said to be one of the longest and largest cul-de sacs throughout the whole of Broxtowe.


For people living in the Hardy Street/Cliff Boulevard area the main issues highlighted were traffic congestion and other driving related problems, ie drivers frequently mounting pavements, parked vehicles restricting visibility for turning at the top of Hardy Street, frequent congestion in and around Cliff Boulevard.


Due to the volume of concerns that were raised I wrote to residents in both areas in June 2015 asking for their feedback not only on what the problems were, but also what they would like to see done to address the issues.  The main body of this report covers the responses I received.


This report is a true reflection of the views and opinions of those people living in these areas, and directly affected by the problems. It is set out in such a way as to allow those reading the report to have a greater understanding of the direct effect of these issues on people’s lives.  There is recognition that many of these problems exist in many other parts of the country and the way forward to resolve or minimise the problem is to work closely with multiple agencies, including county, borough and town councils, highways agency, local schools, the police, health facilities, bus companies and public and private sector organisations.

Pages 5 to 8 set out the findings of the traffic surveys in and around Swingate area Kimberley


Traffic Survey – Swingate area


Responses to a letter from Cllr Richard Robinson to Swingate households delivered in June 2015.



Description of problem/contributory factors according to respondents:


  • Swingate is effectively a cul-de-sac with two ways in (Greens Lane and High street) but only one exit (Greens Lane).  Residents experience delays as traffic builds up on Greens Lane preventing their exit from, and also entry to, Swingate.
  • Regret expressed that building of A610 meant that Knowle Hill became a no through road, thus reducing entry and exit to and from Swingate.
  • Increase in traffic over last 30 years, new schools/nurseries, bigger Sainsbury’s store.
  • Drivers use Kimberley as an alternative route (“rat-run”) whenever there is congestion on M1/A610 and this contributes to overall problem.
  • Impatient driver behaviour coming out of Sainsbury’s store and petrol station, and the precinct opposite.  Drivers get impatient and just drive out, ignoring people coming down from Swingate, or indeed up to Swingate.  Suggested yellow cross boxes would help with this, but would have to be strictly enforced.
  • Drivers straddle both exit lanes when leaving Sainsbury’s car park, thus right turners block people who wish to turn left up Swingate.   A badly located bollard and poor road markings are the main reason for this.
  • Drivers waiting to turn into either the precinct or Sainsbury’s cause traffic to build up.  Poor entry/exit design causes this.
  • Driver behaviour exiting two nurseries at Swingate/Greens LaneCherubs Day Nursery access/exit is abysmal, so many people just park on the road.
  • Blind corner caused by high wall at Cherubs Day Nursery – cause of accidents.  Also, the corner is almost too tight even for cars, let alone larger vehicles.
  • Kimberley school parking problems – parking on blind bend, double yellows, school zig-zags (driver behaviour).


    Opinions suggested from respondents regarding improvements


  • Leave alone/talk to people to resolve situation/walk more.  Not enough – there are serious problems that need tackling.
  • Improve pedestrian experience, encourage walking, wider pavements, reduce dog fouling.
  • Work with Sainsbury’s to find solution.   Alter entrance/exit road markings and remove bollard.  Provide space for a bus layby on Greens Lane.
  • Work with schools to reduce school run traffic, discuss drivers’ behaviour,
  • Scheme to encourage walking to school.   Will require safer routes.


    Specific suggestions regarding Parking


  • Suggest bigger car park at schools.  For drop off and pick up, or any car park where non currently exists (ie Swingate Primary School).
  • Suggest parking restrictions at schools, double yellow lines to prevent dangerous parking on blind corner.  Be wary of this option – double yellow lines outside the school would serious penalise residents.
  • Parking restrictions outside both day nurseries.  At least restrict to one side only, above the junction.
  • Traffic wardens to pay attention to illegal/dangerous on-street parking rather than overstay in car parks.
  • Strict enforcement of no parking on double yellows and school zig-zags.



    Specific suggestions regarding High Street


  • Change High Street to two-way traffic with priority flow given to traffic exiting Swingate.   May need a lights system with traffic sensors.  If Greens Lane is congested, all traffic from Swingate must use High Street, ie temporary No Entry down Greens Lane will keep junction clear.  Also, no right turn into High Street when congestion exists.
  • Change High Street to one-way traffic in the opposite direction to what it is now, that is from Swingate towards Church Hill and Eastwood Road.  Previous arrangement may be better.
  • Do not allow parking on High street and widen High street.  Maybe, used to be that way.  Most properties do have off-street parking or could park in streets opposite.



    Specific suggestions regarding Speed limits


  • 20 mph speed limit on High Street.  From James Street to Greens Lane?
  • 20 mph speed limit on Main Street from Broomhill Road to Nine Corners.  Possible but in heavy traffic speed is already reduce and this maybe a problem when traffic is very light.


    Specific suggestions regarding Bus stop/pedestrian crossing


  • Reposition bus stop/change bus timing point outside Sainsbury’s as this contributes to congestion by blocking vision at Sainsbury’s exit.  Maybe Sainsbury’s should give up a little space to enable a layby to be installed on Greens Lane.  Also move the bus stop opposite the precinct, since both stops are currently directly opposite.
  • Buses waiting at library bus stop causes congestion.   This really should not be a timing point.
  • Reposition pedestrian crossing at junction of Greens Lane/Main street (just by mini-roundabout) as this contributes to congestion.  Crossing is too close to junction.  This should be a pelican-type crossing with a repeater advisory control indicator at the bottom of Greens Lane.
  • There are too many pedestrian crossings and they interrupt traffic flow.  The new crossing on Greens Lane should be a pelican-type with traffic sensing.  It does not supplant the bollard “crossing” close to the Main Street junction and simultaneous use of both crossings is a problem when traffic is already busy.


    Specific suggestions regarding Road improvements


  • A number of big road improvements suggested eg new slip road to A610, new road to Strelley.   However, these ideas are then dismissed as causing more problems and too expensive.


    Specific suggestions regarding Traffic lights


  • Traffic light control of, or instead of, mini roundabout at bottom of Greens Lane.  If installed, these would very much have to be traffic volume controlled and could also accommodate pedestrian crossing facilities.  The downside could be causing traffic build-up on all approaches.  Alternatively, a yellow box junction, possibly with roundabout rules, might be more efficient.
  • Traffic light control needed on High Street if open to two-way traffic.   Maybe, but proper controls should be implemented to ensure optimum traffic flow in both directions.


Suggested further research and Conclusions


Emergency services:

How much of a problem does the fire and ambulance service actually have with Swingate?   Probably not so much along Swingate, but certainly around the Greens Lane/High Street junction/corner, especially when cars are parked there.

What are their views?



What are the accident statistics for the area, particularly outside Sainsbury’s?

Is it known as a bad area for accidents?  Important topic, but suspect very low and not the real issue.

What do the police think?


Involve Sainsbury’s:

What are their views and suggestions?

Could Sainsbury’s mark the two exit lanes more clearly for left and right turners?  They must do this, and remove the bollard.

Reposition Sainsbury’s entrance or the precinct entrance.  Given the petrol station exit too, there is not much scope moving either the Sainsbury’s or the precinct entrances/exits onto Greens Lane.


Involve Trent Barton:

What are their views?  Would they be prepared to move the bus timing point?  This is critically important issue and should be strongly pursued with Trent Barton.


Involve the school and nurseries:

Can they work with parents regarding parking?

Could the school encourage parents to allow children to walk to school?

Strict enforcement of parking restrictions around school.  But not to the ultimate detriment of local residents.


Many suggestions revolve around changing people’s behaviour including encouraging more walking, more considerate parking and drivers thinking about their behaviour.


A number of respondents suggested changes to High Street including two-way traffic or one-way traffic in opposite direction to currently.  This is a key element for Swingate access/egress.


Introduce 20mph zones in Kimberley and Swingate.  There is already a 20mph sign-controlled limit on Swingate during school start and finish times.  Seems unnecessary at other times.  Risk of backing up traffic in the centre of the town.  When traffic is heavy, even 20mph is not usually achievable.  When traffic is light, 20mph would be an unnecessary constraint. 



Pages 9 to 11 set out the findings of the traffic surveys in and around the Cliff Boulevard, Hardy Street, Norman Street, Maws Lane area of Kimberley


Traffic Survey – Cliff Boulevard area


Responses to a letter to these households from Cllr Richard Robinson in June 2015



Problems and the possible solutions


Number one problem by far relates to parked vehicles: Respondents go to some lengths to describe what they see as unsafe, impatient behaviour from drivers.  Vehicles mounting the pavement causes concern to several respondents.  It is emphasised that parking at school times is a particular problem.  Residents are concerned to find a solution as the new houses on the Brewery site will make matters worse.



  1. Parked vehicles create hazard on Hardy Street, Cliff Boulevard and Maws Lane by restricting visibility making it dangerous to turn right at junctions and by making it difficult for two-way traffic to pass.


    Solution: Create more parking space on Cliff Boulevard by doing the following:

  • Encourage people to use their own drives/garages.  Sensible, but accesses must not then be blocked by others parking on the street.
  • Properties on Cliff Boulevard have parking space to rear of properties which is not used – it this was used properly then it would reduce on street parking.
  • Align parking slots on Cliff Boulevard at right angles to road to make better use of available space.  There appears to be plenty of space for this and it would help reduce parking on the street.
  • Create more parking slots on Cliff Boulevard by taking out some of the grassed area.
  • Formalised parking bays on Cliff Boulevard, have build-outs with shrubs.  However, these could be tantamount to chicanes.
  • Widen Cliff Boulevard to allow two-way traffic and a parking lane.


  1. Solution: Restrictions on parking
  • Restrict parking to residents only on Cliff Boulevard and Hardy Street – introduce parking permit system.  Should include for legitimate visitors too.
  • Restrict parking by extending double yellow lines along Cliff Boulevard to High Spannia, on Hardy Street at its junction with Cliff Boulevard top of Maws lane to Cornfield Road and on lower sections of Hardy Street.
  • Enforce no parking on double yellows; police don’t seem bothered about it.
  • Allow parking only on one side of Hardy Street (mimic Maws Lane)
  • No parking allowed at all outside Hollywell school on either side of Hardy Street.
  • Ask parents to use Ascot Avenue or Haydock Close to take pressure off Hardy Street.
  • Ask parents to use Golden Guinea Car Park (not possible as it will be new Co-op)
  • Encourage children to walk to school.



    Other problems identified:


  1.  Cliff Boulevard used as through route from IKEA island to B600
  • Solution: Make Cliff Boulevard more like Maws Lane with parking lane and one direction having priority.
  • Have 20mph zone on Cliff Boulevard, Hardy Street.
  • Reduce speed by making speed bumps more severe.


  1. Cliff Boulevard used by heavy lorries and coaches
  • Solution: Enforce weight restrictions, route coaches another way.
  • Make Cliff Boulevard access only.


  1. Vehicles (4X4s in particular) mount the pavement; creates hazard to pedestrians.
  • Solution: Bollards on pavement to prevent vehicles mounting pavement.
  • Raise kerbs to make it difficult for vehicles to mount pavement.



    Other suggestions made


  1. Make Hardy Street one-way (downhill) or access only.


  2. Make Maws Lane one-way (up-hill).  Important to avoid Lawn Mills Road being used as alternative downhill option.


  3. Adopt Parkham Road (currently unmade road); this would allow access onto Hardy Street for Dorchester Road/Tiptree residents. This would take pressure off Cliff Boulevard.


  4. Link Tiptree Close with Coatsby Road (apparently in original plan for estate) to provide another exit without using Cliff Boulevard.


  1. Have traffic island at the bottom of Hardy Street at Nine Corners, this would slow down traffic coming into Kimberley and make it easier to exit Hardy Street.  This is probably a very good idea in conjunction with a pelican crossing nearby.


  1. Have speed plateaus made of block paving sets as these have visual impact/change of level to reduce speed.


  1. Take out speed bumps and chicane on Maws lane and Cliff Boulevard.   Congestion is the fault of hesitant drivers.


  1. Build a new road between B600 and IKEA island.


  1. Road surface on Cliff Boulevard is appalling, needs resurfacing.


Suggested further research and Conclusions



Get statistics for Maws lane, include exit from Maws Lane onto Eastwood Road, also

Cliff Boulevard, Hardy Street.


Emergency Services:

What do emergency services think, have they had problems with access?



What do police think about this problem?


School input

Discuss with parents.

As with Swingate area work with the school to resolve parking issues around school drop-off and pick-up times.


Main issue relates to problems caused by parked vehicles, so give this priority,  

Speak to residents to resolve parking issues. 


Talking to people and changing people’s behaviour is worth a try before road improvements.




Next Steps / Way Forward

I am including in this report some further information which may be helpful in considering the next steps and a way forward for the development of longer term effective traffic management measures within the areas identified in this report.

In 2011 the government introduced the Localism Act which provided new rights and powers, and allowed local communities to shape new developments in their communities (in particular housing). One of these powers allows the local town / parish councils to develop a local neighbourhood plan.  The opportunity exists within these plans for the local council to ask the question “what other aspects of living in the town need to be considered?”.  Clearly there is a need as part of any neighbourhood plan, to create a series of policies which would address specific current and future traffic management problems, including traffic congestion and pedestrian safety.  There is therefore scope to include traffic management issues as part of the development of a broader neighbourhood plan.

I am aware that Kimberley Town Council are currently moving forward on the development of a local neighbourhood plan.

Following on from our meetings in January I would propose to invite the various agencies mentioned in the body of this report to make comment on the contribution they can make to minimise the current problems and how they may contribute to a longer term strategy.

I have no doubt after having studied the information in the report that whilst new policies and close working relationship with many agencies will contribute to reducing the extent of the problem, the real challenge will be in reshaping or changing people’s attitudes and making them more aware of the affects of their behaviour on their fellow citizens.

I hope that that the contents of this report might make people sit up and take notice and that we can introduce an awareness strategy of how small changes in the way people behave can greatly improve the quality of life for many others.











Additional information updated from contact with residents during January 2016

Corner of High Street Kimberley – a number of residents are seriously concerned about people who are parking around the corner from Greens Lane to go into Cherubs Day Nursery – they park on the left hand side near the entrance (dangerous parking) on top of that people are parking opposite on the road and some cars are parked for a whole day.  This really must be dealt with as a priority.  There is probably a case for double yellows around the Greens Lane/High Street corner on the Cherubs Day Nursery side, as far as the BT exchange entrance.  On the other side of the road, any parked vehicle results in traffic being on the wrong side when passing, and also being even less visible to vehicles coming around the bend.

Regarding Nine Corners

A growing number of people are asking about the possibility of a zebra crossing in this area, and additionally I have also had contact from Rev Barbara Holbrook on several issues who writes as follows:

“RE: Swingate;

I wonder whether there can be a way of coming down from Swingate and turning

left onto High Street and then down Church Hill?   You would still want to

disallow a right turn for people coming up from Sainsbury’s. There would

need to be some priority setting in the short ‘one-way’ stretch to enable

this to happen.  This would allow traffic from Swingate to get out of

Kimberley without having to go through the bottleneck on Green Lane and the

Town Centre. As I told you, we once had a bride turn up 25 minutes late

because the traffic was that bad on a Saturday.  This would also require a right turn restriction from Swingate into Greens Lane whenever the latter is badly congested.  Otherwise, traffic would block the junction making High Street inaccessible.

Re: Nine Corners;

As you know, both Kettlebrook Lodge and our Church Hall have playgroups

every weekday.  A large number of families with small children walk to

playgroup, and cross over the road at Nine Corners.  The reverse is true for

families with children at Hollywell School – who walk up Hardy Street. When

the school come to perform their Nativity play at Christmas, they have the

police there to manage the traffic.  It is also the crossing place for

people using the bus stops. It is a difficult place to cross because of poor

visibility and a poorly defined pavement area by the Brewery gates. I know

that when I cross there, I am never certain about traffic, as there is no

clear distinction about what is pedestrian and what vehicular. Walking on

that pavement with a Guide Dog would be a nightmare.  Along with that, the

‘hidden’ nature of the bend (I have congregation members who have been

coming to meetings at my house for years and hadn’t realised that there was

a right angled bend) means that drivers rarely allow for the lack of

visibility and slow down accordingly.  The number of minor bumps on that

stretch of the road highlights that (I know of at least four in the last 6

months). This will only get worse as the new houses are occupied on Hardy

Street, and the main access to the Brewery Site development is added

somewhere along that stretch of road, especially as the only plans I have

seen have it between two blind corners. As yet, there has been no major

incident there while I have lived here, but it is an accident waiting to


Ideally, a mini roundabout and zebra crossing would be good, as would

ensuring that the access to the Brewery Site was via the existing gate onto

such a roundabout, rather than further down the road”.  Any crossing(s) should be a pelican type and must have traffic sensors so as not to cause undue congestion.  Also, a pelican crossing should be located maybe halfway between a roundabout and the bus stop, but certainly not close to the roundabout.




Rebuilding Labour Britain – January 2016


Jonathan Rutherford sets the scene at the outset of 2016 about how exactly the Labour Party can start the process of renewal.

Family, community & country – earning, belonging & culture, some hard truths and key challenges.

Click on the link below to read the full article, which is reprinted from the Winter 2015 Fabian Review.



Jonathan Andrew Rutherford, is an academic who is a Professor of Cultural Studies at the University of Middlesex. Within British politics Rutherford is associated with the Blue Labour school of thought within the British Labour Party, and has been described as one of its “leading thinkers”.


Kimberley route map

Langley Mill Super Hub – Tram extension Line 4 phase III to Kimberley, Eastwood & into Amber Valley

Langley Mill Super Hub – Tram extension Line 4 phase III to Kimberley, Eastwood, & into Amber Valley


November 2019

On 8 November, Cllr Chris Emmas-Williams (Leader Amber Valley Borough Council) & Cllr Richard Robinson meet with Cllr Barry Lewis (Leader of Derbyshire County Council) in Matlock to discuss the proposals for the tram extension – and in particular how they will benefit Langley Mill and further into Derbyshire.

September 2019

On 5 September 2019 the Jobs & Economy Committee of Broxtowe Borough Council vote by a majority to support commissioning of an engineering study (referred to below).

August 2019

Thursday 29 August 2019 – Broxtowe Borough Council publish their agenda for the next Jobs & Economy Committee on Thursday 5 September 2019; 

Item 8 of the agenda – shows a report recommending commissioning of an engineering study demonstrating how a tram extension from Phoenix Park through Kimberley & Eastwood to the Langley Mill Super Hub (with a fast rail link to Hs2 at Toton) could be reliably delivered;


On 15 August 2019 Cllr Richard Robinson received an unsolicited request to talk through the Langley Mill Super Hub concept with BBC Radio Derby.

There is strong support demonstrated from local people in Langley Mill.

You should be able to find a recording of interview that took place on 16 August at: (if clicking on this link directly does not work – try copying and pasting into a new browser)

– two separate parts to the interview from the link above: 1:14:25 – 1:18

& then from 2:13:44 (for a couple of minutes).

or (click on 16 8 19 edition) – again if clicking on this link directly does not work – try copying and pasting into a new browser.



July 2019

Meetings are held with representatives of Nottingham City Council, business leaders in Broxtowe, Amber Valley Borough Council, D2N2, East Midlands Councils and Broxtowe Borough Council to press the case for the Langley Mill Super Hub option as a key driver for economic growth, improving public transport, promoting jobs investment and meeting key environmental challenges during the coming years.

Very constructive and positive discussions were held and more detailed proposals for taking the Langley Mill Super Hub option forward should appear in the public domain from September onwards.

Pictured below, one of the meetings that took place in July – Cllr Chris Emmas Williams – Leader of Amber Valley Borough Council, Sajeeda Rose – Chief Executive of D2N2, Mrs Ruth Hyde – Chief Executive of Broxtowe Borough Council, Steve Barber (light rail expert) and Cllr Richard Robinson.




February 2019

Formal support for the Super Hub proposals were received from IKEA, Cllr Alex Stevenson (Conservative) Derbyshire County Council and Nigel Mills – Conservative MP for Amber Valley – see respectively the following documents: Tram Extension Langley Mill Transport Hub

2019 02 08 Robinson re Super Hub

In addition two very detailed reports have been submitted supporting the Langley Mill Super Hub along with the documents shown above to East Midlands Councils/Hs2 for funding consideration as part of the East Midlands Hs2 Growth Strategy.  

We are advised that more news will be available on the progress of the Langley Mill Super Hub bid towards the end of May this year.


January 2019

On 25 January 2019 2019 Cllr John Handley, Cllr Margaret Handley & Cllr Richard Robinson met with IKEA representatives on Giltbrook Retail Park to discuss their support the proposed tram extension and integrated transport hub in Langley Mill.

On 22 January 2019 Cllr Richard Robinson and Andy Cooper make a presentation to Heanor branch Labour Party on the proposed tram extension and integrated transport hub in Langley Mill.

December 2018

On Friday 14 December 2018 a meeting is held in Ripley with Nigel Mills MP for Amber Valley, along with Cllr Lydia Ball (Broxtowe Borough Council), Steve Bowers, Sales Manager Bowers Electrical Heanor, Cllr Chris Emmas Williams and Cllr Alex Steveson (both Amber Valley cllrs) and Cllr Richard Robinson.  We presented to Nigel our vision for the Langley Mill Super Transport Hub.IMG_1856

November 2018

Support is received from Heanor Churches Together & The Churches of Kimberley & Nuthall for the tram extension and proposed integrated transport in Langley Mill – click on  the following document EPSON019 to see their support.

A meeting is arranged with Nigel Mills MP for Amber Valley and a number of key stakeholders for 14 December 2018 to discuss the Super Hub proposal for Langley Mill.

Cllr Richard Robinson had further meeting with IKEA representatives at Giltbrook Retail Park on 6 November to learn of their support for the tram extension.


On 2 November 2018, Gloria De Piero MP for Ashfield, Alex Norris MP, Cllr Dave Liversidge, Andy Cooper and Cllr Richard Robinson meet with Cllr Jon Collins – Leader of Nottingham City Council to discuss the tram extension from Phoenix Park, and economic regeneration along the A610 corridor.

October 2018

a) Support is received from independent rail consultant on tram proposals out through Kimberley & Eastwood to Super Hub at Langley Mill, arguing though for an early completion on part of the route by 2023 – click on the following link:  AJ kelm


b) On Thursday 11 October a new group in the community comprising current and former councillors from different political parties, and the local clergy, come together in Kimberley to work and support Economic Growth along the A610 corridor – including the tram extension and improved connected bus services.

In this photo, Conservative Borough & County Councillor John Handley (Broxtowe), Cllr Lydia Ball (Broxtowe Conservative), Cllr Margaret Handley (Broxtowe Conservative), Cllr Dave Liversidge (Labour, Nottingham City – Portfolio Holder for Transport), Rev Canon Barbara Holbrook, Andy Cooper (Chair Kimberley, Eastwood, Nuthall, Kimberley Action Group KENTAG), Bob Charlesworth former Liberal Democrat Cllr Broxtowe and Cllr Jim Dymond (Independent Kimberley Town Council):  




c)  On Thursday 18 October a presentation is made at St Lawrence Church Heanor (as part of Heanor Vision public meeting), outlining the concept of the Langley Mill Super Hub – providing a tram link directly from Langley Mill, through Eastwood & Kimberley to Nottingham, combined with a fast link train directly to the Hs2 hub station at Toton, with electric bus options from Langley Mill to Codnor, and Ripley.

d) On Thursday 25 October Bob Charlesworth, Cllr Chris Emmas-Williams (Leader Labour Group Amber Valley), Rev Canon Barbara Holbrook and Cllr Robinson meet together with Rev Lisa Shemilt (Associate Priest of Heanor, Langley Mill, Aldecar & Marlpool) to further discuss Langley Mill Super Hub and how to engage with and gain support of local clergy.  A further session is arranged for Thursday 29 November.

e) On Friday 26 October – Cllr Richard Robinson met Derbyshire Conservative County Councillor for Greater Heanor – Alex Stevenson – to discuss how we can work collaboratively together to bring investment into Langley Mill and Amber Valley through the advent of the Langley Mill Super Hub.


May 2018

Full link from BBC East Midlands today news (late bulletin) Wednesday 16 May 2018: 


Press coverage of the latest work being undertaken is covered by clicking on both links below

Scan      IMG_0007


Tuesday 20 March 2018

  • A detailed proposal for a tram/transport link from Kimberley & Eastwood out to Amber Valley is submitted to East Midlands Councils, which specific reference to Amber Valley and connectivity with Hs2.  Significant support & endorsement from business and the local community is confirmed including Peveril Homes, Bowers Electrical Ltd, New Horizons Church Eastwood (soon moving to Langley Mill), Heanor Town Council, Codnor Parish Council, Ripley Town Council & the Deputy Police & Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire.  This builds on existing support from Alex Norris MP, Gloria De Piero MP, Light Rapid Transit Association, British Land (owners of Giltbrook Retail Park) etc.

Friday 9 March 2018

Tuesday 6 March 2018

Wednesday 28 February 2018

  • A meeting is held at Broxtowe Borough Council offices in Beeston with representatives from various bodies including East Midlands Councils, Light Rapid Transit Association, & Amber Valley Borough Council to consider how the tram extension could be linked with East Midlands Hs2 Growth Strategy.

November 2017

  • Monday 27 November 2017 – Cllr Richard Robinson attends East Midlands Councils Infrastructure Summit in Leicester and raises Amber Valley, Eastwood, Kimberley, Phoenix Park tram extension as an integral part of East Midlands Hs2 Growth Strategy with Sir John Peace, Chair of Midlands Engine and Maria Machancoses Programme Director at Midlands Connect Project Team.



October 2017

Submissions are made to Broxtowe Local Plan (part II)

to support protection of the proposed tram route to Kimberley and Eastwood, by Andy Cooper – Chair of Kimberley, Eastwood and Nuthall Tram Action Group, Cllr Richard Robinson and Labour MP for Ashfield Gloria De Piero.

The submission from Gloria is shown by clicking on the following linkGtram

Additionally at Broxtowe Borough Council full meeting on Wednesday 18 October 2017 Cllr Richard Robinson covered the Tram Extension in his Ward Members speech covering Kimberley.  He was very pleased to confirm cross party support from the Liberal Democrats at Broxtowe together with sympathetic soundings from some Conservative members in the north of the borough.


September 2017

Readers of the Nottingham Post would most like to see Nottingham’s tram line to be extended to the Nuthall, Kimberley and Eastwood area.


July 2017

A detailed investigation into the viability of a tramline extension along the A610 corridor is being called for by campaigners:


March 2017

On Saturday 18 March 2017 Cllr Richard Robinson together with local residents visit Eastwood Town Council for the Eastwood Neighbourhood Plan public consultation.  Members of Eastwood Town Council confirm that they fully support in principle the tram extension from Phoenix Park through to Kimberley & Eastwood.  They have alternative suggestions for route through Eastwood.

Thursday 23 March 2017 – Labour MP for Ashfield Gloria De Piero and Cllr Robinson both formally write to Eastwood Town Council pledging to work closely with Eastwood Town Council on tram developments.

February 2017

Eastwood Town Council (27 February 2017) deliver hard copy Neighbourhood Plan for consultation with local residents in Eastwood.  A draft on-line copy of the document with the town council’s preference for the tram extension covering Eastwood is shown at the following link:  (page 25).


On 2 December 2016 the following article appeared in the Eastwood & Kimberley Advertiser (click on the following three links): epson005 epson006 epson007 – I support the development of HS2 (with the important provisos that the fares are fully affordable and not premium pricing, and that there are no adverse affects on the proposed tram extension to Kimberley).  On the latter point – there in fact should be some positive effects due to the need for increased connectivity by public transport in wider parts of Nottinghamshire & Derbyshire.


15 November 2016


Kimberley, Eastwood and Nuthall Tram Action Group (KENTAG) cautiously welcomed today’s announcement of the route that the northern section of HS2 will follow, including confirmation of the location for a station at Toton to serve Derby and Nottingham. This is seen as the seed which will deliver a network of light rail routes throughout the region.

Langley Mill Super Hub – Tram extension Line 4 phase III to Kimberley, Eastwood & into Amber Valley

Cllr Richard Robinson said;  “Whilst today’s news is very good news for the prosperity of the East Midlands, we must ensure that construction is planned carefully and allows for other projects. We are particularly concerned that provision is made for the Kimberley and Eastwood  tramline. I have received assurances that this will be allowed for at the design stage, and I want that set in stone.”

“Connectivity is vital for business and the creation of jobs. Now we know that the East Midlands will join the High Speed rail club we want to ensure that the prosperity it brings is shared out and doesn’t stop at Phoenix Park and the Nottingham city boundary”

“The M1, although vital for north-south connectivity, is a barrier to east-west development. The Nuthall roundabout creates a serious disincentive for firms to locate westwards. Just to the north is an underused bridge under which could easily carry a light rail line with the capacity of at least a dual carriageway road.”

(Andrew Braddock, Chairman of the Light Rail Transit Association (LRTA),  said: “Now the HS2 route has been confirmed it is clear we need to address means of getting to its stations. Toton is in a very fortunate position, not only being just one kilometre away from the current terminus of NET but also in a place where various disused mineral railways converged. These lines are ideal for light rail use and can reconnect several former mining towns and villages to the new prosperity. The proposed Kimberley and Eastwood extension to NET would uses parts of these mineral lines.”

Steve Barber (Vice President elect of the LRTA and chair of Beeston and Chilwell for Integrated Transport) added “There is no doubt that construction of NET phase 2 was a difficult process, but the extension to Kimberley would involves no street running and little disruption. Now Nottingham has the beginnings of a network the advantages are becoming clear. Beeston High Road has no retail units available for rent and the town has a shop vacancy rate of just 3%, against national and regional averages of around 10-12%. As happened in Manchester, now is the time for a big expansion to include lines to Kimberley, Eastwood, Gedling and possibly the airport.”

Jim Harkins (from the secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Light Rail Group on Light Rail) said: “Nottingham is to be commended for its work on air pollution. For a city of its size it is punching above its weight and showing the rest of the country how it should be done. Research in Oslo has shown that around 50% of the most dangerous PM10 and other particulates don’t come just from engines but from the vehicle tyres and road surface wearing out and going into the low level atmosphere.  Particles frombrake linings are a source of atmospheric pollution too.

Recent reports from the Universities of Oxford and Manchester amongst others, has indicated a significant link with Alzheimers Disease being caused by the Magnetite particles generated from the interface between wheels and road surfaces.

The steel wheels of electric trams running on steel rails (electric trams) do not emit any of this pollution.

Notes for Editors:

Satisfaction in Nottingham’s trams is running at 98% and exceeds other networks;

Construction of NET phase  alone benefited Nottingham’s businesses by £100m;

The LRTA is a not–for–profit UK based organisation and has members throughout the world. Free of any trade or political affiliation; it is the world’s leading organisation concerned with the achievement of better public transport through light rail, tramway and metro systems in towns and cities world–wide.


August 2016 

this item appeared in the Eastwood & Kimberley Advertiser in August 2016.

For the most up to date details please of ongoing campaigning work on the Tram extension please visit my “Work in Broxtowe Pages” – July and August 2016 updates:

August 2016 – Gloria De Piero – Labour MP for Ashfield (covering Eastwood) gives her commitment to supporting the tram campaign “I am delighted to be working alongside Richard to secure popular support for the tram to be extended to Kimberley & Eastwood”.  She added “it’s a fantastic way to travel and I will be campaigning hard in Eastwood to bring jobs, investment, growth and to reduce traffic congestion as a result of us getting the tram network extended”.



You may have read various reports in local newspapers and heard details on local radio about the tram feasibility study for Kimberley.

The full report presented at this stage by Mott MacDonald is now public and shown here – click on the following link305248-AC-DOC-001 (DRAFT)

As the report is 106 pages long (light bedtime reading), I’ve asked Steve Barber (Vice President elect of the Light Rail Transit Association) to provide a briefer summary – he writes as follows: 


“Basically it looks at 6 possible alignments and immediately dismisses 2 of these. (see pages 60-61 for overview maps). I’ve made the following observations as I’ve worked through the document:

Option 1 is broadly the one Atkins came up with in 2001, we’ve investigated it in detail and frankly would seem to be the preferred option. I’ve concentrated my thoughts on that but just to quickly analyse (and in my view dismiss at this stage) the others:

1a) Too much street running, too slow, property and land acquisition needed and a disruptive build.

1b) Again too much street running, allows for a difficult park and ride site if one at all and disruptive build.


2) Loss of quality amenity, property demolition, time disadvantages.

2a) As 2 but also misses markets and can’t be extended.

2b) This could be a possibility if the tunnel is found to be unusable, but is inferior to option 1


·         A  number of residential developments are proposed along the route. In the past Kimberley Councillors have ensured a route through has been safeguarded.

·         Other than these developments, around 6,500 homes would be connected if the tram runs just to Giltbrook (see my opinion below)

·         Mention is made of future extensions into the Amber Valley

·         HS2 is not seen as a problem to the alignment.

·         The report doesn’t seem to propose as much re-use of bridges and tunnels as I would have thought. It is proposed to demolish the existing, but buried bridge at New Farm Lane, by the cemetry and an at grade crossing is proposed instead of using the tunnel at Watnall. It is vague about this tunnel, it does exist, I’ve been inside it (OK only by about a metre) and we took a railway engineer to investigate; he thought it could be lined and re-used. However, it is filled in and largely inaccessible so there’s currently an imponderable. An at grade crossing would be disruptive, expensive and involve land take with possible demolition. Investagative work definitely needed here.

·         It would pass through a SSSI, which I understand is for geological reasons (the sides of the cutting) so shouldn’t present too much of a problem. However, further on it passes through a SINC which is a fairly low designation, Phase2 overcame such objections by mitigation.

·         Beyond Kimberley, there is a compelling case that it should extend to at least a park and ride, involving an expensive structure over the A610. This seems unavoidable.

British Land were major contributors to this report costs so it is natural that it looks at serving their retail park, this is questioned on the grounds of cost on page 12. However, I would further question as to whether that is the best destination, after the Park and Ride proposed near Awsworth. I would have thought Eastwood with a population of 18,000 and a new major employment site under construction would be better. If the tramway remains on the western side of the A610 there are a couple of under used bridges which lead into Eastwood, the first via the residential areas of Newthorpe Common and Hill top. There may be a third option for this section.


Option 1 as proposed by Atkins and studied in considerable detail by KENTAG and associated consultants is the best option and should be taken forward. If the tunnel and bridges which exist can be excavated and re-used there is virtually no major disruption to the town or elsewhere, this is a totally different project to NET phase 2 through Beeston. Serious consideration should be given to extending the route to at least Eastwood. This is clearly a project for the combined authorities of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire as the benefits to the ex-mining, steelworking and brewery communities are significant.

Independent experts have predicted an extra £300m of growth per annum into Greater Nottingham due to phase 2 of the tram. The A610 corridor should tap into and enhance this but is currently constrained by poor connectivity, due to the M1 acting as a barrier to east-west growth”.


On 7 September 2015 at a meeting of the Strategic Planning and Economic Development Committee, Broxtowe council members voted to ask Mott MacDonald to provide further information on highways and wider transport issues before coming to a firm recommendation on how to consider the Tram route to Kimberley any further.  The committee above will then look at the issues again in December this year.

If anyone has any comments or questions please get in touch with myself or Cllr Andy Cooper (Kimberley Town Council) & Chair of KENTAG – Kimberley, Eastwood, Nuthall Tram Action Group –



1st stage to Kimberley
A further walk of the intended route took place on Sunday 8 February 2015 – a link to a video of the route can be found at:
An indicative route of the proposed extension to Kimberley can be found at the photo above, and also at:
If it helps there’s some general points below:
  • We would envisage the first stop being Hempshill Vale, with then one or two in Watnall/Nuthall with Kimberley then being the final destination for the first part of the extension.
  • (tram stops) Whatever our initial thoughts are the whole purpose of having a Feasibility Study is to ascertain where exactly the prime locations would be and for the experts to give full and proper guidance
  • Concerning the Tram Walk – on 8 February 2015, this was the sixth.  The last one before this was the best attended yet with 50 people walking the route.  In the past Radio Nottingham have attended, and we have got good media coverage.
  • We welcome those who are doubtful about the benefits of the proposed extension as well as those who are in favour to send in comments.
  • The Feasibility Study is hugely important as the report that comes from there will confirm the best route, tram stops etc.
  • Concerning the route KENTAG believe that the route would be as follows: it would leave Phoenix Park on colliery line – then joins up with Great Northern line, but then leave this and joins Old Midland route.
  • The Great Northern route is unacceptable as a tunnel has collapsed there.

More information available from myself – Cllr Richard Robinson or Cllr Andy Cooper – Chair of KENTAG – Kimberley, Eastwood & Nuthall Tram Action Group.

10 lessons from the book of Habakkuk

The pithy remark by Eugene Peterson (The Message) in his introduction to the book of Habakkuk “living by faith is a bewildering adventure“, is probably somewhat of an understatement, but definitely something we can all resonate with.  Indeed we rarely know what’s coming next and not many things turn out just how we anticipate.

There are of course many prophets in the Old Testament, with Habakkuk being just one.   Yet as Peterson further states “most prophets speak God’s word to us, however Habakkuk speak our word to God.  He gives voice to our bewilderment, articulates our puzzled attempts to make sense of things, and faces God with our disappointment with God”.

Whilst there’s only three chapters in total, I think it’s one of the most significant books of the Bible and it speaks so much into the heart of what so many Christians struggle with today (well certainly I do).

Probably the most famous verses are in chapter 2 where the prophet talks about waiting for God, and then at the end of chapter 3 where, despite innumerable problems – the prophet still praises God.

Here’s 10 lessons from Habakkuk I jotted down from a sermon I heard 20 years ago – we’ve looked at them in our Small Group at Trent Vineyard recently – I hope they help you.

1)   Admit your confusion

2)   Talk to God about your feelings

3)   Give God time to reply

4)   Establish a spiritual context in which to think through the problem

5)   Recognise God may keep us waiting for an answer

6)   Understand to live by faith

7)   No matter what, God is in control

8)   Worship God daily and open your heart to fervent prayer & praise

9)   Remind yourself of God’s faithfulness in the past

10) Face every situation with an attitude of joy



Go to Top